Articles

Soft Life vs. Hard Life Mentality: Different Psychological Perspectives on Seeking Happiness

Authors

  • Marvina Anana Univeristas Negeri Yogyakarta
Published September 25, 2025 pp. 31-37 doi.org/10.62872/pj.v2i3.401 CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract

The concepts of Soft Life and Hard Life are two approaches to life that are gaining increasing attention in contemporary psychology, particularly in relation to the search for happiness, meaning in life, and psychological well-being. The Soft Life Mentality focuses on comfort, luxury, and stress avoidance, which in the short term can increase emotional calm and reduce anxiety. However, if overly dominated by a comfort orientation, this lifestyle risks creating a sense of emptiness and a loss of deeper meaning in life. In contrast, the Hard Life Mentality emphasizes struggle, perseverance, and hard work as the path to significant achievement. This approach often produces a more lasting sense of satisfaction and eudaimonic happiness, but also carries the risk of stress, burnout, and physical and mental health disorders if not balanced with self-healing. This study used qualitative methods with literature analysis of various academic sources regarding the relationship between these two mentalities and quality of life, coping mechanisms, and theories of hedonic and eudaimonic happiness. The results indicate that a balance between Soft Life and Hard Life is key to achieving more holistic happiness. Integrating the two not only improves an individual's emotional well-being but also strengthens social relationships and builds a foundation for more sustainable, long-term happiness..

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, A. R., & Fowers, B. J. (2020). An exploratory study of friendship characteristics and their relations with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 260-280.
  2. Arsini, Y., & Dini, A. (2023). Mengembangkan Sikap Self Love Melalui Konten Media Sosial Terhadap Mentalitas Kalangan Remaja. Journal of Student Research, 1(1), 271-281.
  3. Braaten, A., Huta, V., Tyrany, L., & Thompson, A. (2019). Hedonic and eudaimonic motives toward university studies: How they relate to each other and to well-being derived from school. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 3(2), 179-196.
Show 13 more references
  1. Cabanas, E., & Illouz, E. (2019). Manufacturing happy citizens: How the science and industry of happiness control our lives. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Cobo-Rendón, R., López-Angulo, Y., Pérez-Villalobos, M. V., & Díaz-Mujica, A. (2020). Perceived social support and its effects on changes in the affective and eudaimonic well-being of Chilean university students. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 590513
  3. Gentzler, A. L., DeLong, K. L., Palmer, C. A., & Huta, V. (2021). Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth. Motivation and Emotion, 45(3), 312-326.
  4. Liu, Y., & Ngai, S. S. Y. (2020). Social capital, self-efficacy, and healthy identity development among Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantages. Journal of child and family studies, 29(11), 3198-3210.
  5. Lubis, A. H. (2024). Resiliensi: Kemampuan Beradaptasi dan Bertahan dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Hidup yang Sulit. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Konseling, 2(3), 1203-1208.
  6. Maricchiolo, F., Mosca, O., Lauriola, M., & Krys, K. (2021). From ME to WE: A literature review on happiness and well-being focused on relational factors and social interconnectedness. Psicologia sociale, 16(1), 3-25.
  7. Meliana, M., & Sahrani, R. (2024). PERANAN WORK LIFE BALANCE DAN RESILIENSI TERHADAP PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING WANITA DEWASA MUDA YANG BEKERJA. Jurnal Serina Sosial Humaniora, 2(1), 85-93.
  8. Oishi, S., & Westgate, E. C. (2022). A psychologically rich life: Beyond happiness and meaning. Psychological review, 129(4), 790.
  9. Shafiee Rad, H., & Hashemian, M. (2023). Role of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in second language learners’ trait emotional intelligence and emotion regulation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(4), 1619-1641.
  10. Siraj, F. M. (2018). Relevansi konsep jiwa al-ghazali dalam pembentukkan mentalitas yang berakhlak. INQUIRY: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 9(1), 32-45.
  11. Sun, P., Ma, K., Xu, X., & Yan, L. (2025). How self-efficacy shapes professional identity: the mediating role of meaning in life and self-esteem in pre-service physical education teachers. BMC psychology, 13(1), 1-13.
  12. Zulkarnain, Z., & Damara, F. (2019). Kematangan Beragama dalam Perspektif Psikologi Tasawuf. Mawaizh: Jurnal Dakwah dan Pengembangan Sosial Kemanusiaan, 10(2), 305-325.
  13. /, A. N., & Nafisatuzzahra, N. (2025). Dukungan Sosial sebagai Penyangga Stres Karier pada Dewasa Awal: Telaah Literatur Tematik tentang Quarter-Life Crisis. Jurnal Educazione: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pembelajaran dan Bimbingan dan konseling, 13(1), 73-82..

Copyright (c) 2025 Marvina Anana (Author) · CC BY-SA 4.0

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

PJ

My Account

Submit a manuscript